翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Animals in War Memorial, Ottawa
・ Animals named as black-legged
・ Animals of China
・ Animals of Devonian Michigan
・ Animals of the Bible
・ Animals of Yellowstone
・ Animals on Wheels
・ Animals or Human
・ Animals Should Not Try to Act Like People
・ Animals taking public transportation
・ Animals That Swim
・ Animals United
・ Animals with Human Intelligence
・ Animals, Animals, Animals
・ Animals, Men and Morals
Animals, Property, and the Law
・ AnimalTFDB
・ Animalympics
・ Animalympics soundtrack
・ Animamina
・ AnimaNaturalis
・ Animania
・ Animaniacs
・ Animaniacs (video game)
・ Animaniacs Game Pack
・ Animaniacs on home video
・ Animanium
・ Animantarx
・ Animaná
・ Animaritime


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Animals, Property, and the Law : ウィキペディア英語版
Animals, Property, and the Law

''Animals, Property, and the Law'' (1995) is a book by Gary Francione, Distinguished Professor of Law and Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Scholar of Law & Philosophy at Rutgers School of Law–Newark. The book was the first extensive jurisprudential treatment of animal rights.〔Kunstler, William F. (1995). "Foreword" in ''Animals, Property, and the Law''.〕
==Synopsis==
The book is divided into an introduction, which describes Francione's concept of "legal welfarism," followed by three parts: (1) "The Status of Animals as Property, (2) "A General Application of the Theory: Anticruelty Statutes," and (3) "A Specific Application of the Theory: The Regulation of Animal Experimenation." The epilogue is entitled, "An Alternative to Legal Welfarism?"
In part 1, Francione argues that nonhuman animals are the personal property, or ''chattel'', of their owners, even if recognized as a special kind of property. As such, they cannot themselves possess legal rights, because they are the objects of the exercise of someone else's rights. Whenever the interests of an animal are balanced against the interests of the owner (assuming the animal is recognized as having interests), the owner's interests almost always prevail, no matter how trivial they might be. Francione compares the situation to the treatment of slaves in the United States in the 18th and 19th centuries, where legislation existed that ostensibly protected them, while the courts ignored that the institution of slavery rendered that protection largely meaningless.〔Francione (1995), pp. 4–5.〕
He argues further that the United States Animal Welfare Act is an example of symbolic, as opposed to functional, legislation, relying on concepts described by John Dwyer in 1990. It is symbolic, he writes (quoting Dwyer), because it is an example of a law where "the legislature has failed to address the administrative and political constraints that will block implementation of the statute."〔Francione (1995), p. 208ff.
*Also see Sherry, Clifford J (2009). ''Animal Rights: A Reference Handbook''. ABC-CLIO, p. 248〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Animals, Property, and the Law」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.